Thursday, August 4, 2016

2015 Health IT Certification Criteria Capture Patient Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity

The 2015 Health IT certification criteria include the capture of sexual orientation and gender identity in the demographics certification criteria. 

As part of an important patient matching initiative by the Office the National Coordinator for Health IT (ONC), patient sex is one of five key attributes that are now part of the certification criteria.  NAHAM News readers will know that NAHAM is developing Recommended Best Practices on the Collection of Key Patient Attributes.  (Learn more in NAHAM News: “Key Patient Matching Attributes Included in 2015 Health IT Certification Criteria”.)

During the development of the 2015 criteria, patient sex was proposed to be captured with the following values: male (M), female (F), and unknown (UNK).  Of significance in the final rule for health IT certification was the decision to use the coding for “sex” to present birth sex. 

The ONC did not adopt recommendations made by commenters from the general public to capture a patient’s sexual orientation or gender identity as part of this criterion. Instead, the ONC proposed the capture of sexual orientation and gender identity (SO/GI) data as part of the proposed ‘‘social, psychological, and behavioral data’’ certification criterion.  Follow the ONC’s narrative on this issue found in the final rule –

Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity (SO/GI)

We [the ONC] did not propose to include a requirement to capture a patient’s sexual orientation or gender identity as part of this criterion. Rather, we proposed the capture of SO/GI data as part of the proposed ‘‘social, psychological, and behavioral data’’ certification criterion.

Comments. We [the ONC] received a significant number of comments from providers, consumers/individuals, and health care coalitions strongly recommending that we consider including sexual orientation and gender identify as a component of the Base EHR definition (e.g., in the demographics certification criterion) or Common Clinical Data Set definition. These commenters suggested that there are mature vocabulary standards for representing SO/GI and there is strong clinical value in having this data to inform decisions about health care and treatment. Commenters indicated that by including SO/GI in the Base EHR or Common Clinical Data Set definitions, providers would be required to possess this functionality for participation in the EHR Incentive Programs, which could have a large impact for evaluating the quality of care provided to lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) communities.

Response. We [the ONC] thank commenters for their feedback. Given this feedback, the clinical relevance of capturing SO/GI, and the readiness of the values and vocabulary codes for representing this information in a structured way, we require that Health IT Modules enable a user to record, change, and access SO/GI to be certified to the 2015 Edition ‘‘demographics’’ certification criterion. By doing so, SO/GI is now included in the 2015 Edition Base EHR definition. The 2015 Edition Base EHR definition is part of the CEHRT definition under the EHR Incentive Programs. Therefore, providers participating in the EHR Incentive Programs will need to have certified health IT with the capability to capture SO/GI to meet the CEHRT definition in 2018 and subsequent years. We note that like all information in the ‘‘demographics’’ criterion, certification does not require that a provider collect this information, only that certified Health IT Modules enable a user to do so. We believe including SO/GI in the ‘‘demographics’’ criterion represents a crucial first step forward to improving care for LGBT communities. We have not included it in the Common Clinical Data Set at this time.

Comments. One commenter recommended we consider including structured and coded questions for soliciting SO/GI information as part of certification.

Response. While we [the ONC] thank the commenter for providing this recommendation, we do not believe that the suggested questions have yet been scientifically validated for use in health care settings and, thus, have not adopted them. We do, however, believe that these questions are being used today in health care settings as ‘‘best practices,’’ and would suggest that health care providers and institutions decide whether to include these questions in the collection of SO/GI information. These ‘‘best practice’’ questions and the answers we have adopted are:

·        Do you think of yourself as:

o   Straight or heterosexual;

o   Lesbian, gay, or homosexual;

o   Bisexual;

o   Something else, please describe.

o   Don’t know.

·        What is your current gender identity? (Check all that apply.)

o   Male;

o   Female;

o   Transgender male/Trans man/Female-to-male;

o   Transgender female/Trans woman/Male-to-female;

o   Genderqueer, neither exclusively male nor female;

o   Additional gender category/(or other), please specify.

o   Decline to answer.

Does your Access Department have protocols in place to capture birth sex only, or gender as noted on an official government-issued identification, or do you record only what the patient reports?  Does your information technology have fields or do you attempt to capture sexual orientation or gender identity if different from what is reported on a government-issued identification?  Is Patient Access ready to capture these attributes?

No comments:

Post a Comment