Polls Show Number of Uninsured Adults Lowest Since Obama Took Office

The deadline to enroll on the new insurance exchanges is quickly approaching, with just three weeks remaining. The deadline seems to be spurring a dramatic up-tick in the number of adults enrolling in health insurance plans. Acording to the Gallup-Healthways Well-Being Index released Monday the number of Americans with no health insurance has dropped to the lowest levels since President Obama was sworn in. The index found that the percent of uninsured adults dropped from 17.1-percent in the last quarter of 2013 to 15.9-percent in 2014. Experts attribute the increasing number of insured adults to the insurance plans made available by the Affordable Care Act.

The increase in enrollment was found across all demographic groups examined by the index. Hoewver, enrollment throughout the Latino demographic lagged behind other demographic groups. This is notable because the Obama Administration is actively reaching out to the relatively young Hispanic community to encourage enrollment. 

A significant drop in the rate of uninsured adults occurred among African-Americans with a 2.6 percentage point decline. The rate declined 1percentage point among white adults, but only eight-tenths of a percentage point for Latinos. The largest drop in the uninsured rate was a 2.8 percentage point difference for households with an annual income of less than $36,000.

CMS Issues Guidance on Stage 2 Meaningful Use Hardship Exceptions

The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) issued guidance on qualifying for the hardship exception from Stage 2 meaningful use requirements under the federal electronic health record incentive payment program. CMS has been under pressure by stakeholders and lawmakers alike to provide clarification about how to apply and what conditions qualified hospitals and eligible professionals for a hardship exemption

The guidance explains that CMS may grant hospitals and eligible professionals the hardship exception and grant an extension for meeting the Stage 2 meaningful use requirements if their electronic health record (EHR) vendor is at fault for their failure to meet the deadline. This expands on previous statements by CMS Administrator Marilyn Tavenner that the applications for exceptions would be evaluated on a case-by-case basis. 

The guidance specifically states that providers may apply for hardship exceptions if the "EHR vendor was unable to obtain 2014 certification" or the hospital or eligible professional "was unable to implement meaningful use due to 2014 EHR certification delays." If approved, the hardship exception is valid for a single payment year. In the event the application for exception is denied hospitals and eligible professionals may not appeal the decision and any denial is considered final.

The hardship exception application for hospitals is available here.

The hardship exception application for eligible professionals is available here. 

CMS Looks to Limit Estate Recovery Actions for New Medicaid Recipients

Commentators on both sides of the Affordable Care Act (ACA) debate have pointed out that lower-income Americans may be deterred from enrolling in the expanded Medicaid program because of the currently estate recovery actions are allowed. An estate recovery action is a legal collection method that allow states to recover the amount of payments for long-term Medicaid services from patients after their death to repay the state for the cost of their medical care. 

This practice stems from a 1993 federal law that requires states to recoup the costs spent on long-term Medicaid services from the estates of deceased recipients. The 1993 law also gives states the option of recovering all Medicaid costs incurred from the age of 55 until death, even if they are not related to long-term care. In practice this often results in states placing a lien on the deceased's home after being notified of the death. However, states generally try not to collect the debt immediately in instances where a surviving spouse or dependent is living in the home. 

Last week the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) issued a letter to state medicaid directors providing guidance that seek to limit estate recovery actions for Medicaid recipients that qualify under the ACA's Medicaid expansion program. While the letter does not compel states to follow the conditions set forth in the letter, experts say it will likely serve as a deterrent for states considering estate recovery actions against expanded Medicaid recipients. 


More discussion on Medicaid Estate Recovery and the CMS letter can be found at the following sources:

•  Asbury Park Press, Feds: Don't try to bill new Medicaid recipients after their death.
• National Senior Citizens Law Center, MAGI Medicaid and Estate Recovery: CMS Issues State Medicaid Director Letter.
• Modern Healthcare, Reform Update: Medicaid estate-recovery law may hamper enrollment efforts.

Patient Identification and Matching Report Released by ONC

The Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology (ONC) released the final version of the Patient Identification and Matching Report. The report evaluated best practices and current trends in using electronic health record systems to accurately identify patients and exchange information between providers, patients, and caregivers. Mistakes in properly identifying patient health records put patient safety at risk and has resulted in too many patient deaths. 

The drafting process for the report included an industry environmental scan with input from stakeholders at meetings, on calls, and requests for submitted comments and recommendations. NAHAM was an active participant throughout the drafting process and provided recommendations focused on improving patient safety that are featured in the report. NAHAM's recommendations can be found on page 76 of the report. 

The report resulted in 10 findings that ONC will use as they move forward with the process of improving electronic health record systems and patient matching to improve patient safety.The findings are below.

Findings

1. Standardized patient identifying attributes should be required in the relevant exchange transactions. 

2. Any changes to patient data attributes in exchange transactions should be coordinated with organizations working on parallel efforts to standardize healthcare transactions. 

3. Certification criteria should be introduced that require certified EHR technology (CEHRT) to capture the data attributes that would be required in the standardized patient identifying attributes.

4. The ability of additional, non-traditional data attributes to improve patient matching should be studied. 

5. Certification criteria should not be created for patient matching algorithms or require organizations to utilize a specific type of algorithm. 

6. Certification criteria that requires CEHRT that performs patient matching to demonstrate the ability to generate and provide to end users reports that detail potential duplicate patient records should be considered. 

7. Build on the initial best practices that emerged during the environmental scan by convening industry stakeholders to consider a more formal structure for establishing best practices for the matching process and data governance. 

8. Work with the industry to develop best practices and policies to encourage consumers to keep their information current and accurate. 

9. Work with healthcare professional associations and the Safety Assurance Factors for EHR Resilience (SAFER) Guide initiative to develop and disseminate education and training materials detail best practices for accurately capturing and consistently verifying patient data attributes. 

10. Continue collaborating with federal agencies and the industry on improving patient identification and matching processes. 

No Extension for ICD-10 Implementation

Marilyn Tavenner, Administrator for the Centers of Medicare & Medicaid Services, announced today that there will be no extension of the October 1, compliance deadline for the nationwide conversion to the ICD-10 diagnostic and procedural codes. Speaking at the Healthcare Information and Management Systems Society convention in Orlando, Florida, Tavenner also explained that CMS was not changing compliance requirements for Stage 2 despite extensive pressure on the agency. 

Stage 2 of the electronic health record incentive payment program requires providers to electronically exchange healthcare records with each other to improve the interoperability of CMS' value-based payment programs. Eligible hospitals must commence 90 consecutive days of meeting the meaningful-use criteria on schedule. The starting date for most hospitals was October 1, 2013. However eligible professionals and physicians which operate on a fiscal year must begin compliance on April 1 or July 1, 2014. 

CMS will consider extensions on a case-by-case basis for providers and health IT vendors to obtain a "hardship exemption" that will extend the deadline for that facility. Tavenner does not expect the exemptions to delay full Stage 2 implementation by 2015. 

Timing is Crucial for Effective ICD-10 Education

The ICD-10 billing code system will expand the number of billing codes in the ICD-9 from 18,004 to 155,000 codes. This change will take place by October 1, 2014. The expanded codes create a need for the biller to have a more in-depth understanding of the medical conditions and diseases to accurately bill the patient. If billers are untrained or improperly trained it will create havoc for practices. Practices across the country are wrestling with the questions of 'when' and 'how' to train employees.

Several training methods are available. The depth of the training ranges from self-paced online modules to certification courses that require dozens of hours of in-person instruction. With the huge increase in individual codes and variety of training programs many administrators are left scratching their heads at the decision of how to train their staff. There seems to be a consensus that an online training module provides the flexibility and informational value that best suits the educational needs of many practices. 

Experts recommend that the training material used is centered around billing codes most commonly used in the practice. For example, the employees of a cardiologist practice should focus their training on the medical billing codes for heart-related disease and conditions. 

The experts also suggested that practices begin training now by assessing how well the staff works with ICD-9. The practice should address any bad practices and frequent problems before moving to the more complex ICD-10 system. 

Many experts suggest waiting to train employees until about three months before the transition to ICD-10 to avoid workers forgetting how to use the new coding system since they will be still be interacting with the older system daily.

CCHIT Will No Longer Test or Certify Electronic Health Record Systems

After almost a decade of testing and certifying electronic health record systems (EHR) the Certification Commission for Health Information Technology (CCHIT) will no longer provide these services. CCHIT was the first provider of testing and certification services, and is still the most commonly used provider in the nation. Nearly half of the health IT systems on the Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology at HHS'  Certified Health IT Product List have been certified by CCHIT.

CCHIT stopped taking applications from vendors in January. Executive Director Alisa Ray stated that they would wind down the remaining 70 systems scheduled for tests by April or May of this year. Ray explained that the delay for implementing meaningful use requirements lead to the decision to move away from certification and testing. 

The company will also stop private-label certification programs for other health IT systems. CCHIT is phasing these programs down as the organization shifts to a global focus. 

Consumers will have eight certification bodies to choose from with the withdrawal of CCHIT from the marketplace. Five of the companies are recognized by the ONC as Accredited Testing Laboratories. Three other companies are ONC Authorized Certification Bodies. All eight companies test and certify EHRs to qualify them for participation in the EHR incentive payment program established by the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009.