In "Critics of Medicare's Overall Hospital Star Rating Push for Changes, "Kaiser Health News staff writer Jordan Rau reports: "Over the past decade,
the federal government has publicized 115 different ways to measure medical
quality in hospitals, from assessing wait times in emergency rooms and noise
levels outside hospital rooms to tracking blood clots in surgical patients. But
the latest effort, to combine dozens of metrics into one patient-friendly
quality indicator, has proven the most contentious. The Centers for Medicare
& Medicaid Services recently postponed its plan to release the new rating
system, which would award one star to the worst-quality facilities and five
stars to those with the best marks. ... Hospital leaders who previewed the preliminary
rating system say the formula seems skewed against institutions that treat the
poorest or toughest patients, meaning those with complex illnesses."
That is the headline leader in today's Kaiser Health News (Wednesday, May 18, 2016).Over the past decade, the federal government has publicized 115 different ways to measure medical quality in hospitals, from assessing wait times in emergency rooms and noise levels outside hospital rooms to tracking blood clots in surgical patients. But the latest effort, to combine dozens of metrics into one patient-friendly quality indicator, has proven the most contentious.
The proposal was delayed under criticism from hospital groups as well as Members of Congress.
While the goal of getting quality ratings into the mix for patients as consumers of healthcare, the formula to be used for star rating isn't perfect, and risks sending the wrong general message about specific facilities or healthcare systems.
The broader debate about the government judging hospitals has been going on since Medicare began publishing quality ratings in 2005. But it has intensified since passage of the Affordable Care Act, which instructed Medicare to use quality metrics in setting payments.
Teaching hospitals as a group have tended to fare poorly from some of these financial incentives. This year, for instance, nearly half of major teaching hospitals are losing 1 percent of their Medicare payments because of high rates of infections and surgical complications. Facilities with more low-income patients, who often face difficulties affording medication, following complicated recovery instructions and getting to doctors regularly, typically have higher readmission rates.
No comments:
Post a Comment