Many in the health IT field
believe that implementing a national patient identifier and a deadline
extension for stage 2 meaningful use requirements would ensure a more cohesive
operation of patient access and identification systems and increase patient
safety. Both of these problems require
congressional action to solve, but with a Congress that fails to pass even the
most basic pieces of legislation and appropriations it is unlikely there will
be any legislation addressing these issues in the year to come.
National Patient Identifier
A national patient identifier
would go far to improve patient safety by improving the accuracy with which
patients are matched with their medical records. Ideally, a national patient identifier would
be a unique number for each patient with a two-digit checksum at the end of the
number. In practice this would allow a patient’s data to move completely
through multiple data systems without comingling with other patients’ records
that may contain similar names, addresses and other identifying factors.
However, the likelihood of
legislation requiring a national patient identifier is very slim after Congress
voted to overturn a HIPAA provision that would have required a patient
identifier in 1998. Congressional opposition focused on privacy concerns and
the capability providers have to identify patients with several different
identifying factors. Former national health IT coordinator Farzad Mostashari,
M.D., explained that he believed the odds were very low for a national patient
identifier and that it would require the industry proving they are unable to keep
patients straight by cross-checking a patient’s identity with other identifying
factors available to the provider.
Meaningful Use Incentive Program
The electronic health records
meaningful use incentive program was created to advance the adoption of health
information technology nationwide. Beginning in 2014 eligible hospitals and
professionals will have to comply with stage 2 of the regulatory standards in
order to receive corresponding incentive payments.
Senator Alexander and Senator
Thune, along with 15 other Senators, wrote a letter to HHS Secretary Kathleen
Sebelius requesting more time for implementation of stage 2 standards. Their letter stated, “If the goal is to
improve care by achieving broad and meaningful utilization of EHRs, providing
sufficient time to ensure a safe, orderly transition through Stage 2 is
critical to having stakeholder buy-in, a necessary component of long-term
success.
However, former national health IT
coordinator Farzad Mostashari, M.D., does not think that this extension will be
granted. Without speaking to the merit
of the request, Mostashari recently told a group gathered at the CHIME Fall
Forum that the extension would take up to a year to approve, and the extension
requested is a year. The overlap would through U.S. health IT into “total chaos”
due to the uncertainty during the rulemaking process to amend the schedule.
Don
Fluckinger’s article, “Shut down thoughts of a national patient identifier,stage 2 extension,”
A podcast discussing the benefits
of a national patient identifier can be found here.
Alexander-Thune Letter from 17
Senators to Secretary Kathleen Sebelius requesting a meaningful use stage 2
delay can be found here.
No comments:
Post a Comment